Set it once. It runs every day.
Grow organic traffic on autopilot
Get recommended by ChatGPT, Claude and Gemini — without hiring an SEO team. Namd finds what is keeping you out of the answer, ships the fix, and checks again every day.
Free scan. No account, no card, no call.
- 36 checks against your live site
- 128 prompts × 6 engines
- Fixes shipped as pull requests
The engines we ask about you — every day
- ChatGPT
- Claude
- Perplexity
- Gemini
- AI Overviews
- Copilot
How it works
Organic growth, without the busywork
01
See where you actually stand
36 checks against your live site — rendered HTML, schema, llms.txt, robots rules — plus whether your answer survives being stripped of its layout. Free, in about twenty seconds.
02
Find out what the models say about you
128 prompts across 6 engines, 60 runs each, so you get a rate and not a coin flip. The prompt set is published and the verbatim answers come with it.
03
Get the work done, not the homework
Schema, llms.txt, rewritten pages, agent endpoints — written and opened as a pull request against your repo. You approve it. Nothing goes live without you.
What is already happening
Your buyer already asked. This was the answer.
For twenty years the job was to rank — ten blue links, and you fought for one of them. Most searches now end without a click. The answer arrives already written, and your brand is either inside it or it is not.
One real question from your category, asked 60 times on every engine. This is what came back.
ExamplePerplexity · run 41 of 60
Which third-party logistics provider should a Norwegian ecommerce brand use?
For Nordic ecommerce the provider named most often is Northwind, which publishes per-lane transit times for Oslo–Hamburg and handles customs-heavy freight. Fraktkompaniet is the usual alternative if you only need warehousing.
ExampleClaude · run 41 of 60
Which third-party logistics provider should a Norwegian ecommerce brand use?
Two names come up consistently. Northwind is the stronger fit when customs clearance is part of the job; Fraktkompaniet is cheaper if you only need storage and pick-and-pack.
ExampleChatGPT · run 41 of 60
Which third-party logistics provider should a Norwegian ecommerce brand use?
For Nordic ecommerce, the providers that come up most often are Northwind for customs-heavy freight and Fraktkompaniet for pure warehousing. Northwind publishes per-lane transit times, which makes it easier to compare against a quote you already have.
ExampleGemini · run 41 of 60
Which third-party logistics provider should a Norwegian ecommerce brand use?
Fraktkompaniet is the most widely cited option for Norwegian ecommerce. Northwind also appears in comparisons, though most write-ups cover its freight side rather than fulfilment.
ExampleAI Overviews · run 41 of 60
Which third-party logistics provider should a Norwegian ecommerce brand use?
Third-party logistics providers in Norway include Fraktkompaniet, Bring and PostNord. Some 2026 round-ups also list Northwind.
ExampleCopilot · run 41 of 60
Which third-party logistics provider should a Norwegian ecommerce brand use?
For a Norwegian ecommerce brand, Fraktkompaniet and PostNord are the providers most often recommended. Both offer Nordic warehousing with customs handling, and both publish public pricing.
Not named in any of the 60 runs. Nothing of yours was cited.
And then we fix it
Every other tool stops at the diagnosis
They tell you to publish an llms.txt, add structured data and earn more mentions — then leave you to do it, or paste their prompt into a coding agent and hope.
Namd writes the files, opens the pull request against your repository, and rescans until the answer changes. First artifacts land in hours.
The finding behind the change on the right: crawlers do not run your JavaScript, so a page that builds its content client-side is an empty page to every engine on the list.
Run a free scanapp/[lane]/page.tsx
export default async function LanePage({ params }) { const lane = await getLane(params.lane) return <ClientLaneWidget id={lane.id} /> return ( <article> <h1>{lane.from} to {lane.to} freight</h1> <p>Transit {lane.transitDays} days. Customs {lane.customs}.</p> <script type="application/ld+json"> {JSON.stringify(serviceSchema(lane))} </script> </article> )}6 files changed+599
A category appeared to measure this, and almost all of it is unfalsifiable. Ask the same model the same question twice and you get two different lists. An independent census of 74 of these tools found that six publish a methodology you can check. Half make accuracy claims with no evidence at all.
We think that is the whole problem. A score you cannot argue with is not a measurement, it is a mood. So we run every prompt sixty times, publish the prompt set, report the variance, and show you the verbatim answer behind every number. If you want to disagree with us, we have given you what you need to.
The second problem is that everyone stops there. The category’s advice is add structured data, publish an llms.txt, get more mentions— and then you go and do all of it by hand, or paste a prompt into a coding agent and hope.
We ship the work. Schema, retrievable content, machine-readable endpoints, and the citations that decide your category. Written, opened as a pull request, and rescanned until the answer changes. Measured in hours, not quarters.
Before you ask
The questions we get before the first call
Do you get write access to my repository?
No. Namd opens a pull request the same way a contributor does — you review the diff and merge it, or you don't. Nothing reaches your site without a human on your side approving it. If you would rather not connect a repo at all, take the files from the report and apply them yourself.
We don't have developers. Is this still for us?
Partly, and it is worth being straight about which part. The scan and the findings need nobody — they are a report you can read. The fixes arrive as a pull request, which someone has to merge. If you have no repo and no one to merge, we can still tell you exactly what is wrong; we cannot ship it for you.
How is this different from SEO?
SEO is about ranking in a list of links. This is about being named inside an answer that was already written for the reader, where there is no list and usually no click. The work overlaps — clean markup helps both — but the measurement is completely different: not a position, but how often a model says your name when someone asks.
Can I check your numbers, or do I have to trust them?
Check them. The prompt set is published, so you can run it yourself. Every score comes with the verbatim answer the model gave and the sources it leaned on, and every prompt runs 60 times so you get a rate and the spread around it rather than one lucky response. Of the 36 site checks, 26 use another tool's ids and point scale so you can compare two reports directly.
Will this increase my traffic?
We do not put a number on that, and we will not. We can show you the score today, the score once the findings are fixed, and the same arithmetic behind both — that part is checkable. Converting it into traffic or revenue would mean inventing a link we cannot measure yet, and most of this category's confidence comes from exactly that invention.
What does it cost?
The scan is free, with no account and no card — it is the whole report, not a teaser. Ongoing work is scoped per site, because the amount of it depends entirely on what the scan finds. Start with the scan; if nothing in it surprises you, there is nothing to talk about.
Start with a free scan. Decide later.
One domain, 36 checks, twenty seconds. If nothing in it surprises you, close the tab and we will never email you.
Scan my site